Fertility Dr.

Texas Fertility Clinics

Fertility clinics are staffed medical clinics that assist couples, and sometimes individuals, who want to become parents but for medical reasons have been unable to achieve this goal via the natural course. Clinics apply a number of tests and sometimes very advanced medical procedures to obtain the desired conceptions and pregnancies.

For the male, semen collection is a standard diagnostic test to ascertain problems with the semen quality. In vitro fertilization is one common assisted reproductive technology procedure performed at a fertility clinic.

 

A Texas fertility clinic has taken a groundbreaking step into a “Brave New World” by providing already created embryos for sale to prospective parents who evaluate the traits of the egg and sperm donors.

The Abraham Center of Life in San Antonio describes its new commercial enterprise as the “world’s first human embryo bank,” but critics are calling it a “baby supermarket” and a “baby broker service.”

In making their embryo selections, prospective parents receive photos of the male and female donors when they were infants, even sometimes as adults, as well as family histories and medical reports. The donors have received medical tests, and the embryos have been “graded” medically to assure their quality, Abraham Center director Jennalee Ryan said in a letter on the clinic’s website.

The donors are from various ethnic groups, Ryan said. The male donors must be college educated, and most of the female donors have at least attended college, she said. Most of the men have doctorates, she said. Ryan also said the center will provide pre-tested surrogate mothers.

“Who wants an ugly, stupid kid?” she asked, according to the Associated Press.

Pro-life medical ethicists decried the new embryo trade and called for its regulation.

“Children are gifts to be received by parents, not toys to be chosen from a catalog,” said C. Ben Mitchell, director of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity in suburban Chicago. “Being parents is not like shopping for a new boat or designer handbag.”

Mitchell, a consultant for the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, said organizations like the Abraham Center “have no oversight, no meaningful regulation. They profit by preying on the desires of infertile couples. [They] feed the most selfish impulses of our culture.”

David Stevens, head of the Christian Medical Association, said the Abraham Center “crosses ethical and moral boundaries by turning babies into commodities. By stressing the educational level of sperm and egg donors, this center is preying on parents who have fallen victim to the false notion that babies are a status symbol and that intelligence, race or appearance are somehow measures of worth. Do we really want to grade babies like meat in a supermarket?”

Ryan defended her center’s new service, telling The Washington Post, “We’re just trying to help people have babies. For me, that’s what this is all about: helping make babies.”

She said her center’s service is less expensive than in vitro fertilization and adoption. It also has a greater success rate than IVF, she said.

The center’s first 22 embryos were from an egg donor in Arizona and a donor from a Northern Virginia sperm bank, Ryan told The Post. He is a lawyer, six feet tall with blond hair and blue eyes; she is a student in her 20s with brown hair and hazel eyes, The Post reported Jan. 6.

Previously, infertile couples have been able to select egg or sperm donors based on their characteristics, but this is apparently the first time embryos have been produced ready-made for order.

The Abraham Center is named after the biblical patriarch Abraham, whose wife, Sarah, gave birth to a son when she was 90 years old.

PILL FAILS TEST -– The greater availability of the “morning-after” pill for women does not reduce abortions or unwanted pregnancies, according to a new study.

The report repudiates the claims of advocates who have argued that wider access to the pill would lower both abortion and pregnancy rates.

The review of 23 studies on the pill, also known as “emergency contraceptive,” showed that forecasts of expanded availability would result in “a direct, substantial impact ... may have been overly optimistic,” three researchers wrote in the January issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, according to The Washington Times.

“To date, no study has shown that increased access to this method reduces unintended pregnancy or abortion rates,” the researchers said, adding the consistency of the study’s “primary findings is hard to ignore.”

The study’s results came less than five months after the Food and Drug Administration approved the non-prescription sale to adults of Plan B, a “morning-after” pill. The FDA’s new policy made Plan B available without a prescription for use by women 18 and older. Females 17 and under will need a prescription, a requirement previously for women of all ages. Plan B will be available for purchase at pharmacies and health clinics. It is to be kept in stock behind the counter at each pharmacy, so proof of age can be checked, according to the FDA.

Elizabeth Raymond and James Trussell, two of the authors of the new study, had argued before their review that easier access to the “morning-after” pill would reduce unintended pregnancy and/or abortion, according to Concerned Women for America.

“The same researchers who demanded the ‘morning-after’ pill become non-prescription now admit that making the drug easy to get does not live up to their promises of reducing pregnancies and abortions,” CWA President Wendy Wright said in a written statement. “Due to intense pressure from them and other abortion advocates, the [FDA] caved and made it non-prescription to buyers over 18, denying women the medical counseling and testing that they need before taking this drug.”

In addition to other concerns, most pro-life advocates oppose the availability of the “morning-after” pill because it has abortion-causing qualities. The pill works to restrict ovulation in a woman. It also can act after conception, thereby causing an abortion, pro-lifers point out. This mechanism of the drug blocks implantation of a tiny embryo in the uterine wall.

Plan B is basically a heavier dose of birth control pills. Under the regimen, a woman takes two pills within 72 hours of sexual intercourse and another dose 12 hours later.

The FDA approved Plan B for sale by prescription in 1999. It had approved Preven, another “morning-after” pill, in 1998. Preven is no longer on the market, according to the FDA.

ABORTION LEADER –- Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards has gained the endorsement of a woman whose name is synonymous with abortion rights advocacy.

Kate Michelman, who was president of the National Abortion Rights Action League for nearly 20 years, has agreed to be a senior adviser to the Edwards campaign, the Associated Press reported Jan. 5. Michelman, whose former organization is now known as NARAL Pro-choice America, will assist with outreach to female voters, according to AP.

Michelman’s enlistment signals Edwards’ intention to seek the vote of abortion supporters in a Democratic field that apparently will include only pro-choice candidates. Michelman made her choice even before Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York made her intentions known whether she will be in the 2008 race.

“I made my assessment based on factors other than gender,” Michelman said, according to AP. “Gender’s important, but it’s not the only factor.”

She said Edwards’ commitment to women’s rights and focus on ending poverty convinced her to support him, AP reported.

“[Edwards] has never backed down or retreated from a woman’s right to choose, and he understands women’s role in society,” said Michelman, who retired from NARAL in 2004. “And he knows that most Americans in poverty are women and children.”

Edwards was John Kerry’s vice presidential running mate in 2004 as a senator from North Carolina.